Removing God From Your Metric...

 Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said, "Man has forgotten God." What is meant is that the biggest issue today is whether man can live without God because He doesn't think He is necessary to answer the ultimate and big questions of life any longer, as Nietzsche said, "God is dead," or irrelevant and no longer needed!  Evolution seems to make atheists feel intellectually fulfilled and to be able to challenge the religious establishment and elites.  That's quite a commentary even on today's society and that was many years ago.  

Our technical expertise has surpassed our wisdom on how to best use it. We discover that inventions can be used for evil as well as good; the same thing Alfred Nobel wondered about dynamite. He felt so guilty that he founded the Nobel Peace Prize to compensate all the evil that could be done in his name.   We are rapidly seeing and overseeing our own destruction without any outside help and we can blame no one but ourselves. Will Durant said that "no society has been able to maintain morality without the aid of its religion!"  and George Bernard Shaw is said to have quipped, "No nation has survived the loss of its gods."  You must realize that it was the church that kept the Roman Empire becoming utter chaos and lawlessness. 

What can be done? Man needs to realize his identity in God which he has forgotten: he is in the image of God and hot-wired for dignity, purpose, meaning, fulfillment, self-worth, and self-esteem.  Without God, life makes no sense and if you do not reckon God in the dynamic, man becomes a useless enigma and purposeless lifeform, no better than the beast.  Have you ever observed an ape building a chapel? Of course not! They are oblivious to God because they are not in His image and not meant to worship Him. We have a heart to love God, a mind to know Him, and the will to obey Him; animals do not. 

How can we find our purpose or calling? William James said "the best use of a life is to spend it on something that will outlast it.". We must live for something bigger than ourselves!"  We must not then just live for the here and now and eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow we die!  We are meant to live in light of eternity!  We have our identity in God! 

This image we have enables us to have the madness of laughter, the tears of joy and sorrow, the communicative ability to talk to God, the rational mind to reason, the morals to be responsible for our actions, the emotions and love to have a relationship with God on a personal level and find joy in God, the free will to decide if we want to serve God, and the intellect to know God. We have many things in common with God too besides that: we have a sense of humor, we are artistic and have an aesthetic sense, and we are musical and especially that we ae imaginative and creative and can think on an abstract level! This is why we are not stupid like the animals who cannot know God.

Bertrand Russell, atheist philosopher, said that "unless you assume a God, the question of life's purpose is meaningless."  We simply come from nothing but blue-green algae scum, we have no divine or ultimate purpose in living, we are headed nowhere after death and this means there is no justice because it is necessary according to philosopher Immanuel Kant that God be the Judge that He can make all things right that were wronged in this life.  Too many people get away with crime and evil and never see justice or their comeuppance and God is necessary to even the score and settle matters on Judgment Day.   In sum, consider the wise  words of Dostoevsky: "If there is no God, all things are permissible."   Soli Deo Gloria! 

Can Man Live Without God?...

"Men have forgotten God." (Alexander Solzhenitsyn)
"A person cannot live without worshiping something." (Fyodor Dostoevsky)

The whole concept of modern Secular Humanism is to exalt man (glory to man in the highest!) and to dethrone God and put Him in His place, as they see it. In other words, they proclaim: Up with man, down with God! Man has attempted to make a name for himself ever since the tower of Babel (cf. Gen. 11:4) and believes he can get along without God's intervention, grace, or providence. Man is deluded into thinking he can rule God out of the universe and doesn't need Him. 

 Pertinent remarks by great thinkers: "Religion is indispensable to private and morals and public order" (Cicero); "No society has ever been able to maintain a moral life without the aid of its religion" (William Durant). Humanism has been defined as "religion without God." And you don't have to be an atheist to have no place for God in your life, practical atheists believe in God, but live as though there is no God. Psalm 10:4 (HCSB) sums it up: "There is no accountability since God does not exist."

Humanist historian/philosopher (and author of The Story of Civilization) Will Durant posed the dilemma we face today as the postmodern philosophy (that "God is dead") that permeates society; and humanists try to be good without God in the equation: "The greatest question of our time is not communism vs. individualism, not Europe vs. America, nor even the East vs. the West; it is whether men can bear to live without God." People have no excuse not to believe in God (cf. Rom. 1:20), but they foolishly suppress the fact and are in a state of denial. They seem to think that God is no longer relevant, that we can solve our issues and problems without His input or intervention, and that we are basically good, not evil.

We live in an age when sinners decide that they are their own judges of morality and can make their own value judgments: "Everyone did what was right in their own eyes," much like Israel did, as recorded in Judges 21:25. Men find themselves judging God, rather than realizing He's their judge. Now the biggest problem nations face is that of keeping the peace, and there shall be wars and rumors of wars till the end, and when we reach peace we will no longer feel we need God. 

America is a so-called good nation by human standards as recorded by secular Alexis de Tocqueville, in his work Democracy in America, which he wrote after visiting the U.S, posited that our strength lie in our "goodness," and when we "ceased to be good we will cease to be great." This is not based on biblical nor historical precedent, but only personal deduction and observation.

Yes, America is different (we are probably the most religious nation on earth), yet we are failing on the world stage due to poor leadership and the good citizens (believers) cease to be salt and light and evil is winning by default, not because Christianity has failed, nor because its worldview is faulty, but because Christians fail to stand up and be counted, to take their stand for the right and to fly their Christian colors. It has been said by philosophers and historians that morality in a nation cannot be upheld without the aid of religion: George Bernard Shaw said that "no nation can survive the loss of its gods." George Washington said, "It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible."

Christians ought to protest the secularization of a society that seeks to eradicate God from the public square and discourse. We cannot silence God, though! If we try to go to war with Him we will lose and our nation will lose its blessing and providential hand. We fight this by speaking up against the evils of society, even if it entails becoming activists and doing whatever you can to mobilize the church and equip them for the battle. We are not to passively allow Satan to seize control!

When you take God out of the picture, there remains a vacuum that is filled with satanic activity. When we cease to worship God, we will ultimately find something else to worship, because man is meant and designed for worship! God is the motive people have for good behavior because you see very few hospitals, orphanages, relief organizations, leprosariums founded by infidels. In India, they think that the suffering of man is caused by bad karma and you shouldn't interfere with another's karma!

We are at the point in our society where we don't know right from wrong and have lost our moral fiber because there's no moral compass and God condemns those who call good evil and evil good (cf. Isa. 5:20). There is an absolute standard to judge by and people do instinctively know right from wrong due to having a conscience and everyone is culpable to be blamed because of transcendent or natural law, which is above national law and even nations are subject to.

You could say that the new battle is against God and the new war of independence is from God! People, in general, think that the Ten Commandments are obsolete and don't apply to a modern society and don't feel bound by them, free to make up their own rules as they go along to suit themselves. As long as they can think of some reason to justify themselves and have good motives, the reason that they are doing the right thing.

But goodness isn't defined by man, but by God and is in conformity with His nature. The basic diagnosis of man is that he does things his way and not God's way (as Isa. 53:6 says, "... we have turned every one to his own way..."). We cannot know good without knowing God, for He is the final arbiter of it and will judge us and our standards of good versus His. 

 Without God, Shakespeare summed up the essence of life as Macbeth mused: "... 'tis a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury signifying nothing." If we are not in God's image, we are mere animals and glorified apes: "Do you think we are mere animals? Do you think we are stupid?" (Job 18:3, NLT)--teach man he is an animal and he will act like one.

"Without God, life makes no sense," according to Rick Warren! "If there is no God all things are permissible," according to Fyodor Dostoevsky, and there can be no absolutes or standards to measure perfection by. The world has nothing against religion as long as it remains privatized, but we are to spread the word and be obedient to the gospel without suppressing it--it's a command to obey not an option to consider. The implications of atheism are profound: No judge to make us feel guilty; no lawgiver to obey; no ruler or sovereign to submit to, no creator to emulate, know, and love; no hell to shun; and no heaven to look forward to--how dismal and bleak an outlook!

Romans 1:18ff shows what transpires once man leaves God out of the reckoning. In the final analysis, God will bless America by association again when the church repents and gets back on track fulfilling the Great Commission (not the Great Suggestion), and not when the church tries to implement Sharia law or usher in the Millennial Kingdom, to "advance the cause of Christ" through legislation or government. Soli Deo Gloria!

Putting God On Trial...

"I will give them a heart to know Me, for I am the LORD, and they will be My people, and I will be their God, for they will return to Me with their whole heart" (Jer. 24:7, NASB).
"... 'There is no accountability since God does not exist'" (Psalm 10:4, HCSB).


The Bible assumes the existence of God and is not apologetic; it makes no effort to pander to those who doubt His existence and offer proof. When asked point blank for evidence to support God's existence, put the skeptic on the defensive and ask him what evidence he's found that God doesn't exist! Christians put the Lord on trial all the time when they try to "prove" Him or offer evidence in order to convince the skeptic or to argue someone into the kingdom by rationalization or presentation of proofs. There are indeed several ways to make it seem reasonable to believe in God, but a God who demands evidence isn't worth our worship. The fact should be obvious and people are without excuse for not believing in God (Christianity isn't about believing in a God, but in the God who is there!); people know the truth and they foolishly suppress it (you have to know it to suppress it!).


When we try to prove God the skeptic is in the position of being the judge ascertaining whether there's enough evidence to convince him. The power of witness and conviction is in the use of the Word of God, not in our clever arguments and rationales. People don't realize it but they claim they know that there is no God, when this is a logical contradiction, which cannot be proved (a universal negative). Atheism is irrational and intellectually bankrupt and has no basis in fact--the only reason people deny God is out of moral concerns, not intellectual ones--all their questions might be answered and they still wouldn't believe, or they could witness miracles and still not believe. One must realize that all knowledge begins in a step of faith in which he cannot prove the premise; scientists are people of faith just as much as religious people, they just bet the farm that science has the answer and not God.


Faith is a gift of God and God expects us to use the faith we have if we are to get more; they are all judged according to the God that they did know and the moral principles they were aware of--our works. God can make a believer out of the most stubborn person and melt his heart into godly faith and repentance from stone to flesh (cf. Ezek. 36:26), as it were. When we judge God by weighing the evidence we put Him on trial and say He needs our approval and judgment to be legit. Evidence is only for the believer to strengthen the faith that is already there to help him realize the reasonableness of Christianity, as John Locke termed it, just like miracles strengthen and support faith, but note that faith doesn't come from miracles, but miracles from faith! This is a paradox!


No one can disbelieve in Christ due to lack of evidence, and there is never enough evidence for the stubborn and unwilling skeptic, who is on a power trip or mind game and is engaging in intellectual arrogance, not intellectual honesty. God promises to bring faith by the hearing of the Word, i.e., preaching! We should never break faith in the Word as the means to faith, and not our clever proofs. God needs to open hearts and quicken faith within them for the person to come to saving faith. Just head knowledge won't do, because God requires believing in the heart with a love for the Lord. If anyone loves not the Lord, he is anathema, Maranatha, under a curse till Christ comes, according to 1 Cor. 16:26. We must realize that faith is given, not achieved and those who do believe are not smarter, wiser, more virtuous, nor intelligent than the infidel, but brought to faith by the grace of God and not their own merit or pre-salvation work. Grace from beginning to end, as Christ is the Author and Finisher of our faith.


When the gospel is preached, the Holy Spirit falls on those listening and does a work of grace in their hearts--for we are all given a measure of faith and receive the same faith (cf. Rom. 12:3; 2 Pet. 1:1). Acts 18:27 says that we "believed through grace," and this was not because we were out-argued or intellectually convinced, but our hearts were changed by grace. We have nothing to boast of in God's presence! Faith is not a work or that would be the beginning of merit-based salvation! Jesus said that the "work of God is that you believe" in Him, and we are not saved by works of righteousness that we have done (cf. Titus 3:5), but by His purpose and grace alone. As Paul said, "grace reigns through righteousness," in Romans 5:21 (which means it's irresistible and sovereign).


In the final analysis, God is our judge--we are not His judge! We are the ones on trial and have been found guilty of sin in need of redemption, justification, reconciliation, and propitiation. The only ones who find the truth are those who admit they're lost and could be wrong. Christianity is fact-based and based on historical records, not a fable, myth, hearsay, or man's origin and we don't need all the facts nor all the answers to come to faith, God expects a leap of faith to enter the kingdom and we must trust the Lord for the answers and come to know the Answerer (as Psalm 34:8 says, "Taste and see that the LORD is good," or that the proof of the pudding is in the eating)!


Our assurance is not based on conjecture, but a certainty, as sound as the Word itself. Bertrand Russell was asked what he would say to God, should he be wrong: "Why didn't you give more evidence?" He admits there is evidence, after all! As I said, there is never enough evidence for the hardened, stubborn heart who doesn't want to obey God, for Jesus said, "If any man is willing to do His will, he shall know..." (cf. John 7:17). The heart of the matter is that it's a matter of the heart! "The fool has said in his heart that there is no God..." (cf. Psalm 14:1, emphasis mine). Where's the skeptic's heart, not how smart is he? Just like Paul said in Romans 1, that people refuse to acknowledge God and be thankful and their foolish hearts are darkened--they became fools!


The fact is that God exists and people foolishly suppress what they know about Him due to the calloused hearts. Paul makes it clear in 2 Tim. 2:25 that repentance precedes knowledge of the truth and Augustine asserted that we believe in order to understand--faith precedes reason! In other words, we don't argue the way to God, but accept Him as a given and proceed from there to make deductions. God is the beginning point, not man as the Word says, "In the beginning God..." Athanasius said it well, "The only system of thought that Christ will fit into is the one where He is the starting point. Proverbs 1:7 makes my point too: "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge..." We commence with God, we don't conclude with Him!


To explain just why we cannot engage in a battle of wits or evidence is because people always interpret evidence in light of their worldview and the evidence they already accept and assume is true--what they do is "file" it away till they can reconcile or answer it to the satisfaction and worldview; they don't want to believe it or God would open their eyes (cf. John 7:17). We cannot reason to God, but with God on our side, we reason from God ("In the beginning God..."), for the Bible and logic are OUR weapon! Remember the ancient axiom: "All knowledge begins in faith." Soli Deo Gloria!


Po

The New Atheist On The Warpath

"The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God'..." (Psalm 14:1, NIV).  NB:  he says this in his heart and is irrational.  

Today's atheists(or anti-theists) are more strident than of yesteryear since they don't "live and let live" with Christians anymore but are bent on eradicating Christ from the public square and discourse--erasing any vestige of religion; not letting any Divine Foot in the door.  Faith in God used to be the default position, but today's resurgent atheists are on the march!  They are on the offensive like the redoubtable Madalyn Murray O'Hair, who succeeded in outlawing prayer in public schools and Bible reading as a mandatory curriculum or requisite.  If these atheists are so sure there's no God, why spend so much energy fighting someone (why are they so angry?) and who doesn't exist, while denying all the causes championed by Christians?

One man in Russia concluded there must be a God since they keep telling him there isn't.  The problem with Marxism, according to Dostoevsky, is atheism--a philosophy hard to buy into since they propagate that "God does not, cannot, and must not exist." Not everyone is so ready to be committed to this bleak outlook on life.  They have a psychological need to be atheists; they may have had estranged relationships with authority figures, especially their fathers, and see the so-called Father Figure as an assault since they don't want any accountability to a Higher Power.  They respect authority figures but deny the Ultimate Authority and Lawmaker.  The atheist doesn't want a Judge to criticize his immorality or lack of ethics, he refuses any guidance for life from a Lord of lords, Guide, or Ruler, he refuses to submit to the authority of King of kings, he wants to deny the natural order of creation with its Creator.  

In this way, he has no hell to shun, no judgment to fear, and no accountability to anyone but himself and he wants to live for the day, not in light of eternity, being a law unto himself and doing what is right in his eyes. They don't want to worship God (his due respect)--they won't worship nothing!   Men will always find "something or someone to worship" (according to Dostoevsky) in the "vacuum" (Blaise Pascal's term) or void left in the soul that is only content in God.

But it is a contradiction in terms to believe in order without an "Orderer," to believe in purpose without teleological sources or a "Purposer" (which is purpose personified) or justice without the Standard of good and evil and a Final Judge. In fact, the word teleology or purpose is a dirty and repugnant word to atheists.   He can look at beauty and deny an Artist!  He looks at the design and insults his Designer!  How can one believe in a "beginning" (i.e., the Big Bang as a scientific fact) and deny a Beginner? It's not a valid faith to deny God since He reveals Himself to all, but He also hides and will only be found by those searching for Him, not triflers.  

The only way you can be an atheist is to be intellectually dishonest, for it's a bankrupt philosophy and one must commit intellectual suicide to be one, for the bulk of evidence is on God's side.  Denying God is a fool's errand and one must muzzle all the inner voices of God bearing witness of Himself in creation. The cosmos didn't create itself (a logical absurdity); creation implies a Creator!  It is intellectually dishonest to deny God since one must be omniscient and omnipresent--being everywhere at the same time and knowing everything; also it's philosophically and logically impossible to prove a universal negative!  For instance, you'd have to be everywhere to prove there are no little green men too.  They can't prove God doesn't exist! We don't know all the answers yet, but we know the Answerer.  

These so-called militant atheists are bent on destroying religion in the name of no God, which seems ludicrous. They seek to eradicate any vestige or trace of God from the open marketplace of ideas, not even letting a Divine Foot in the door.   In fact, they believe, as Freud postulated, that believing in God is a "neurosis" and Richard Dawkins believes is a "mind virus" one catches if naive enough to believe, according to The God Delusion.  God is not a throwback to our need for a Father Figure, on the contrary, He is the fulfillment of who we are and we are made for Him, to bring Him glory, giving us pleasure and fulfillment.  Freud and some psychologists believe we have a psychological need to believe; au contraire, they have a psychological need not to believe!  We all have psychological needs, the point is which ones line up with the facts and evidence.

They say that we have faith, but they have facts!  This is fallacious reasoning since all knowledge is contingent and starts with faith, accepting some presupposition you cannot prove!  It's not a matter of faith versus reason, but which set of presuppositions you want to buy into and accept.  The secular atheist usually bets the farm on the fact that science alone is the only reliable source of knowledge! They also put faith in the belief of materialism and naturalism: all that exists is matter and all things have a natural explanation and that means no supernatural.  Christians are people of faith, as they call us, but they are people of faith too, faith in science!  They know God exists; however, they suppress it feigning intellectual problems.  Faith in God is not "pie in the sky," nor wishful thinking, nor the "opiate of the masses" as postulated by skeptics.....

It's the atheist who's irrational since he denies God in spite of the evidence, while Christians don't believe despite the evidence since there's ample reason to believe and God does show Himself to earnest seekers because He's no man's debtor.  It is the atheist who has blind faith, since he bases it mainly only experience and feelings, not evidence, while Christianity is a fact and history-based faith.  If Christians are obliged to show proof, so must atheists! 

In the final analysis, they are without excuse! As Paul says in Romans 1:20.   No one can disbelieve due to lack of evidence; however, there's never enough for the skeptic.  But there's no "smoking gun" evidence either way--both need faith!  I will close with Norman Geisler:  "I don't have enough faith to be an atheist!" In sum, it's not faith versus reason, but faith versus faith!   Soli Deo Gloria!

What's Wrong With Atheism?

"Unless you assume a God, the question of life's purpose is meaningless." --Bertrand Russell, atheist philosopher, and mathematician  "There is no accountability since God does not exist" (Psalm 10:4, HCSB).  "The fool has said in his heart [notice it's the heart, not the mind] that there is no God" (cf. Psalm 14, 53:1).   

Atheism is a bankrupt faith that cannot be proved and is only believed because of a gut reaction or animosity to God because they don't think He's fair, He didn't give them something they wanted, they see injustice and cannot rationalize it, or justify the ways of God to man, as did Milton in Paradise Lost.  Atheism doesn't have a leg to stand on because you cannot prove a universal negative:  how would you prove there are no little green men, for example, without being present everywhere and knowing all?  Only God knows for sure!  And so you would have to be God, quite ironically, to disprove God.   Atheists often claim they are good people but have no motive other than selfish ones to be so.  But they cannot explain goodness or why there's evil in the world.  The biggest obstacle is that most people know there's a God as certainly as the law of cause and effect and see the evidence of a Designer from all the design in the cosmos.

The issues they cite are that they believe science, namely evolution, has undermined the Bible; God is merely a "delusion" or neurosis to be cured; God is the "opiate" of the people (what Marx thought) or anti-depressant; God is a "neurosis" or "projection" like the desire for a "father figure", a la Freudian theory; or that He is unnecessary to explain reality.   The cosmos cannot be all there is because there is evidence of intelligence in the universe and this cannot be explained away as random energy or atoms in motion--there's something other than matter/energy!  The cosmos had a beginning, and needs a cause or Beginner; because we know that everything in time and space had a beginning, but who began the so-called big bang to begin everything? ( It is a principle of logic that everything that begins to exist has a cause and everything captive to time had a beginning.)

Atheists need to know that they are people of faith also, and really of blind faith because they have no hard evidence that there is no God, they just cannot explain issues that have answers but they refuse to accept.  They may be offended by God and have objections but not proof.  There's more evidence for God than against Him, but one doesn't need all the answers to believe, even though there is sound evidence to base faith on. Norman Geisler wrote a book, I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be An Atheist, quite appropriately. 

There is an ulterior motive for being an atheist:  They don't want accountability, culpability, or responsibility!  Just as Albert Camus said, "The absurd is sin without God," and Dostoevsky said, "If there is no God, all things are permissible."  They want to believe they are mere animals and not in God's image, thus they act like animals by and large not answering to anyone.  They want no righteous judge to watch their behavior, and supernatural creator to worship, and no divine lawgiver to obey!  How convenient to feign intellectual problems when it's a matter of the heart!  The heart of the matter is that it's a matter of the heart! 

The knowledge of God can be suppressed or muffled, but not destroyed--atheists live in a state of denial hiding behind smokescreens to muddle the issues or change the subject!   Most atheists think of themselves as superior intellectually or as assuming the moral high ground, as they see Christians as hypocrites, but this is not the case because Christianity is defensible in the open marketplace of ideas and in the public square.  Atheists do worship something or someone even if they claim to be nonreligious or have no God you can worship yourself or your abilities. 

Man is by nature a religious being and must worship something, for we are hard-wired for worship.  You can be religious without having a religion too, according to John Dewey!  Atheism has even been declared a religion in the high courts.  In the final analysis, they want to start with man and explain away God, rather than start with God and explain man!   It's similar to the Protagoras, the Greek philosopher, saying, "Man is the measure of all things."  Dostoevsky said that if we don't worship God, we'll find something else to worship 

This applies to Christians too because they can become practical atheists, living as if there were no God, despite faith in Him.  Dostoevsky was right:  "Man has forgotten God." And Will Durant puts it quite bluntly that "the greatest question of our time is whether men can bear to live without God," for in the eyes of many, "God is dead", and man has killed Him, like Nietzsche claimed, or made Him irrelevant and unnecessary.  Atheism raises more questions that cannot be answered. It cannot answer life's ultimate questions.  One paradox to consider is why so-called militant atheists have such animus toward a God that they don't believe exists, as if they hold a personal grudge--what did God do to them?  What we are witnessing is anti-theism or militant atheism whereby they have declared war on people of faith.

In sum, atheism doesn't have all the answers and ignores the obvious evidence given to all, and God says they are without excuse (cf. Rom. 1:20)!  No amount of evidence, circumstantial, experiential, or direct, will convince some doubters and skeptics.   In the end, one must ask the atheist what evidence is there that there is no God!  Christians see evidence everywhere, while they ask where is the evidence there is not God.   There's ample evidence to the open-minded and willing, but never enough to convince those who don't want to believe!   We can be assured God doesn't believe in atheists!

CAVEAT:   WHERE YOU BEGIN HAS A LOT TO DO WITH WHERE YOU'LL END UP!    Soli Deo Gloria!

Just Gimme The Facts!

"Truth forever on the scaffold, wrong forever on the throne."  (James Russell Lowell, 1844, The Present Crisis)

We must measure our faith by the object it's in--its validity is dependent on the reliability and trustworthiness of the facts.  There is no such thing as perfect or total objectivity with man, and the faith we have begins with something we cannot prove, but accept as a starting point. Even in geometry, they make assumptions.  Note that your presupposition determines your conclusion:  if someone tells you he saw your wife talking to a man and said she was cheating, you would conclude that she wasn't, but just made a friend because you know her and he doesn't!  That's an example of two people seeing the same fact in different lights and drawing separate conclusions. You cannot use circular reasoning, assuming there is no God, and then concluding there are no miracles, for instance; because the presupposition that there is no God is a leap of faith.  God has given a man all the proof he needs and has no excuse not to believe there is a God (cf. Rom. 1:20).

Believing something doesn't make it true, nor does disbelieving something make it false (objective truth exists regardless of belief, and can be known--"you will know the truth and the truth will set you free," according to John 8:32, NIV).  Truth is reflective of the mind of God and agrees with God's reality and the world--it's absolute and timeless.  According to Augustine, "all truth is God's truth" and consequently "all truth meets at the top" according to Aquinas. Note that people confuse fact and truth, or truth and opinion.  We have a right to our own opinions, but not our own facts.  There is no universal belief, but there is universal truth!  We don't have the right to fabricate our own truths, but we have a right to our own opinion, even if people disagree.

Christianity is a religion of facts and the believer has nothing to fear from scrutiny, there is no suddenly discovered the so-called fact that's going to destroy the credibility of Christianity after 2000 years.  In order to discover truth in a scientific sense or using the scientific method, you must be willing to go where the facts lead--dogmatic science is not science.  Socrates said that in order to begin learning you must admit your ignorance. and to find truth, you must admit you could be wrong! All knowledge begins in faith, and Augustine said that he believes in order to understand.

God is able to open the eyes of our hearts to see spiritual truth.  If you are unwilling to admit you could be wrong, you will never arrive at the truth--even scientists have been wrong, historians have misinterpreted history, and philosophers have come up with unsound, wacky ideas.  All of the wrong ideas have been because man basically only accepts the facts that fit his opinions or theories.

Spiritual truth is not subject to scientific analysis, Christianity is the only religion based on history, and if you could disprove its reports the faith would crumble--many have tried, only to fail and to become believers.  You cannot disprove or prove history in this scientific, empirical sense since history by its very nature is nonrepeatable.  God is metaphysical and we cannot measure God, or subject Him to laboratory conditions with variables and experimentation.  God is neither audible, visible, tangible, nor auditory.  God cannot be known by our tests or experiments, because He demands faith. The question of God's existence is philosophical, and out of the domain or province of scientific research or verification.

It takes faith to believe in God, but once you do it's like the proof of the pudding is in the eating--"taste and see that the LORD is good" (cf. Psalm 34:8). But it also takes a leap of faith to disbelieve in God or to become an atheist--he cannot disprove God because logically no one can ever disprove a universal negative (e.g., try disproving the existence of little green men somewhere in outer space!).

The problem with an atheist is that he cannot defend his position and there is virtually no substantial evidence that cannot be refuted for that worldview.  The fact is that it takes more faith to be an atheist; Norman Geisler wrote a book, I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist.  Ray Comfort wrote God Doesn't Believe in Atheists, to make a similar point!   The problem with an atheist is that they don't want to believe, not that they cannot.  It's not an intellectual problem, but a moral one--they don't want accountability for their life and principles.

People also don't have an open mind, they have their minds made up and don't want to be confused with the facts.  In the theory of evolution, they have twisted and manipulated the facts to fit their theory, not fit the theory to the facts.  It's not a matter of which side (creationism or evolution) has faith or reason, but what set of presuppositions one commences with.  It has never occurred to atheists that they could be wrong (they are just unwilling to accept the God-hypothesis, which they find repugnant), and what those consequences would be (hellfire and judgment). 

Faith precedes reason and I must stress that all knowledge begins in faith. Proverbs 1:7 says that the "fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge."  We all learn from each other, even Christians, because no one has a monopoly on the truth or even on wisdom (that includes Solomon). In the final analysis, what conclusions you reach depend upon your preconceived notions and how willing you are to follow the evidence and the facts to the truth.

The purpose of Christianity is salvation, not education or enlightenment in the Buddhist sense, and the Bible was written to change lives and save souls, not to increase our knowledge.  We must never be content just to be doctrinally correct but must realize the importance of applying our knowledge.  When we learn something we must ask what difference it makes and what our purpose in learning it is.  Knowledge is not an end in itself, but a byproduct and a means to an end.  Ignorance is not bliss, and it's not knowledge that binds us but ignorance.  Jesus said that knowing the truth sets us free (cf. John 8:32).

I'm not referring to the possibility or existence of absolute truth, of which Postmodernists are suspicious of, but of facts that we should be able to agree upon (Christianity is one religion based on facts).  Facts are basically propositions that are indisputable, such as the sun's eclipse on such and such a date.  It used to be considered fact that the earth was flat and the center of the solar system until science was enlightened!   Science has been called a moving train since its theories and so-called facts vary over time and adjust to new experiments and data.  For instance, astronomers no longer hold that the cosmos is eternal, but that there was a big bang and it had a beginning.  The whole point is that if we cannot even agree upon the facts, how are we going to get along and progress?

The danger in today's intellectual power elite or the intelligentsia is the rise of "scientism," or using science for unscientific purposes and assuming that the only reliable facts are those derived by scientific endeavor; e.g., Carl Sagan said that evolution is not a theory, but fact, and that "the Cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will be."  These statements are unscientific, and, just because a reputed scientist makes them, doesn't lend them credence nor viability.

Everyone, in summation, is a person of faith (it's not a matter of faith versus reason, but which set of presuppositions you adhere to):  Secularists put a lot of faith in science and the scientific method and deny outright the supernatural, and won't let a divine foot in the door; while Postmodernists have faith that you can know nothing for certain and all truth is relative--no one is in a position to judge your truth--especially religious or spiritual truth and reject the fact of science being the answer to man's dilemmas; atheists have faith that God cannot does not and must not exist--unfortunately, the weakness of their philosophy is the problem of atheism per se, which cannot be validated or proved, and is irrational.

On the other hand, Christianity is rational and meant to be understood by the mind, but it's not rationalism, putting ultimate faith in the power of reason as the only epistemology because he chief function of reason is to show that some things are beyond reason.  Soli Deo Gloria!  

Confronting Atheists

"Two things amaze me:  the starry skies above and the moral law within."  (Immanuel Kant)

A word to the wise is sufficient:  You cannot rationalize God nor conclusively prove His existence, though you can show evidence and facts leading in that direction--it will take a step of faith to know Him--"Taste and see that the LORD is good" (cf. Psalm 34:8).  However, God has entered history in the person of Christ and proved it by His resurrection; but history is by its very nature nonrepeatable!  Note also that you cannot argue someone into the kingdom and infidels are seldom convinced by argument.   They have feigned intellectual problems which are a smokescreen to hide their moral rebellion, in which they don't want to be accountable to God for their lifestyle--it's a matter of the heart, not the mind!

Atheists think they have you cornered without any recourse of logic when they flatly deny there is a God, by saying simply, "I don't believe in God!"  Something can be true whether believed or not--their denial doesn't alter reality.  They have no way of defending their position any more than any other universal negative, which is impossible to disprove, like saying there are no little green men.  Only God knows all and is everywhere and can make such a claim.  Atheism is a bankrupt philosophy and has no basis in fact--if he asks you to prove God, just retort that he cannot disprove Him either--both sides require faith, it just depends on which set of presuppositions you are willing to have as your starting point.

Everyone has faith, but faith in God is God-given, not achieved and not everyone has this gift, but if they seek after God He will make Himself known to the sincere, but not to the triflers.  The atheist has to realize there is objective as well as subjective truth, and that God fits in the category of absolute truth, and it doesn't matter whether you accept it or not, it's true for everyone and for all time, everywhere; as for me, I don't have enough faith to be an atheist!

Denying God is like denying there's a designer when you see a design, or a creator when you see a creation, or an artist when you see art, or an orderer when you see order, or a planer when you see a plan or purpose.  Purpose is a dirty word to the atheist, who refuses to see a purpose in living and in creation--everything is one big fluke of nature.   If I said I don't believe in air because I don't see it, you'd think I was crazy, because you can see what it does!  People often wonder where is God when they should be wondering where isn't God.  They ask why there is evil if God is good when they should be asking why there's so much good if there isn't a God.  And why doesn't God stamp evil out if He is good?  None of us would be left!

There are many reasons to believe in God:  The law of causality or of cause and effect, i.e., the First Cause or Unmoved Mover; the teleological nature or purpose of the cosmos; the Anthropic Principle is seen on earth, whereby it is perfectly suited for man, often called the fine-tuned universe;  over 2,000 predictive prophecies that were fulfilled; changed hearts upon conversion and knowing Him; the moral code within man's conscience, which shows God cares a lot about right and wrong; the resurrection of Christ which was either the biggest hoax and fake news event in history, or its most wonderful blessing; the answer to the beginning of the cosmos in having a Beginner; the movement of history according to God's plan heading toward a consummation in Christ, which will be fulfilled in Revelation's prophecies; the movement and experience of the Holy Spirit and miracles He brings about; and answers to questions like the origin of life which science cannot measure.

You cannot use science to prove or disprove God any more than using a Geiger Counter to measure voltage.  You can't put God in a test tube!  There is no laboratory condition to make a scientific experiment for God either and thus the scientific method is wholly inappropriate and inadequate.  Believing in God is a matter of faith, not knowledge, and this is what pleases God--faith.  This is ultimately a philosophical question because it's out of the domain of scientific endeavor.   We are meant to walk by faith, not by sight and all must take the leap of faith to get to know Him personally.

Denial of God is a wholly irrational proposition, and anyone would see this unless he had the prejudice that there is no God already in his mind and has a closed mind--you must be willing to go where the facts and evidence lead to ever arrive at truth!  Only believing in God can satisfy a needy heart as Pascal said, "There's a God-shaped vacuum in our heart only God can fill."  Augustine also said likewise that our hearts are restless till they find their rest in God!   Remember in conclusion that there is no ultimate intellectual conflict--the battle is in the heart and the heart of the matter is that it's a matter of the heart as it is written:  "The fool has said in his heart, There is no God..." (cf. Ps. 14:1). In other words, they are in a state of moral rebellion against God and His Law.

The Bible never apologizes for its assumption of God, making no effort at proof.  People know it but they suppress it or muffle it.  The problem is that God hides Himself and must be sought diligently to be found.  Though God is neither visible, tangible, nor audible, He can be experienced and known.  The point to ponder is that all knowledge begins in faith; It's not a matter of faith vs. reason, but which set of presuppositions you start with via faith.  Faith in science is still faith! Evolution is touted as the inescapable fact that is the key to all knowledge--the Bible says the fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; nevertheless, today's militant atheists are dedicated to eradicating Christianity from the open marketplace of ideas and any mention of Him in the public forum--they not only deny God's existence, they are anti-God and are radicalized to promote atheism.  Soli Deo Gloria!

Do We Need Proof For God

Was Richard Dawkins right in his book The God Delusion that claims belief in God is like a "virus that the naive catch"? You cannot prove God to the unwilling (neither can you disprove God to the willing), belief is a choice we make. ("If any man is willing to do His will, he shall know....") If I could prove God, then I would be equal to God intellectually. There is just enough evidence to believe in God if you want to, and enough darkness to not believe if you don't. "God's chief quarrel with man is that he doesn't SEEK Him," says John Stott.

The Bible presupposes the existence of God and doesn't try to prove His existence, but says, "The fool has said in his heart that there is no God." I hope the following "proof's"shows the probability of God's existence to the objective searcher, and will silence the unbeliever who thinks believers are ignorant (actually agnostic means ignoramus). John R. W. Stott is quoted as saying, "We must not pander to a man's intellectual arrogance, but we must cater to his intellectual integrity." The problem is this: Man has the INCONVENIENT truth of believing in God because as Aldous Huxley said, disbelief liberates us sexually. We are going against the tide.

Blaise Pascal has said there is a "God-shaped" vacuum in our souls. St. Aurelius Augustine, bishop of Hippo, said that our souls are restless till they find their rest in God. Eccles. 3:11 says that God "has set eternity in the hearts of men." God cannot be proved because He is not measurable by scientific means; you cannot have 3 feet of love or 5 pounds of justice and likewise, God is not tangible, visible, nor audible--but you cannot deny their reality. In sum, These things cannot be verified by science.

History is another area of the fact that, since it is nonrepeatable, it is not verifiable scientifically. The evolutionist who denies God actually believes in infinite time plus sheer chance. Paul Little calls this the "junkyard mentality," where one believes that the cosmos or the earth just happened like a tornado going through a junkyard and assembling a jet plane, (or like throwing a 6 on a die 5 million times in a row). Even if the whole cosmos were filled with junkyards, it still would not happen. Chance is also compared to a blind man trying to solve Rubik's Cube, which would take 1.35 trillion years if he moved one time per second (according to Sir Fred Hoyle). Believing that life happened by chance is not even accepted by many scientists today. Instead, they believe in "Directed Panspermia," which is that life was somehow planted here from outer space! (This is called the principle of infinite regression, thought of by Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of DNA.)

As for the complexity of life, one human cell contains more information in it than an entire volume of an encyclopedia. Chance is truly stretching it--there must be a designer for this design. Doesn't a building have an architect? "Every house is built by someone, but the builder of all things is God" (cf. Heb. 3:4).

Several arguments for the existence of God have made a foothold into Christian theology. They are as follows:

The ontological proof (God exists because we have an idea of Him, like justice must exist because we have thought of it, for example, where did we get the idea of justice if it doesn't exist?--the greatest thought man can have is of God, for instance--there is a tug towards God like the moon's tides); the cosmological proof (every effect must have a cause, nothing happens by itself, God must be the uncaused cause, first cause, or unmoved Mover of the Universe, not that they have discovered the cosmos had a beginning, there must be a Beginner by deduction--therefore, that begins to exist has a cause);

the teleological proof (the purpose [atheists avoid this word because it implies there is purpose to life--existentialist philosophy denies any purpose for man], order, design, harmony and beauty, and intelligence in creation means someone must be behind it who has great taste or organized skill and is not haphazard--we are not a fluke; for instance, the Anthropic Principle says that the earth was designed perfectly for man, thus indicating ID or intelligent design (implying a Supreme Mind);

the moral argument says that God must care a lot about right and wrong--he is seen as a judge or arbiter, we all have a sense of right and wrong and appeal to a higher standard, a moral compass or higher law, that we assume everyone accepts, and the laws of nature are known to everyone innately ("They show that the requirements of the law are written in their hearts...their conscience either accusing them or excusing them.") and we all violate them, there must be a judge to mete out justice in the end or life would be a joke ("Shall not the judge of all the earth do right?"), there are things universally accepted as wrong, and this is not a matter of social evolution or a matter of taste, like saying I don't like broccoli and you do; so one of us is wrong--examples would be incest or rape, which would be okay if there was no God--if there is no God, everything is up for grabs);

and finally, the ethnological argument (virtually every tribe known to man, no matter how primitive, has an awareness of God in some form--so it must be natural for us to believe in God that you have to teach a child NOT to believe in God, it is so inborn)--no one is BORN an atheist!--but note that there are two kinds of atheists: practical, who live as if there were no God; and theoretical, who have rational arguments they have thought out, which are usually more from bad experiences than philosophy.

There is no easy answer to evil, though, but faith sees things in a new light. They say: "How come bad things happen to good people?" Well, how come good things happen to bad people? Are we not all "bad" in God's eyes?  Remember, no religion has the complete answer to evil. God's relation to evil and sin is a mystery; however, God is holy and can have no contact with evil (like matter and antimatter) and cannot approve of it (cf. Hab. 1:13).

Napoleon, who called Jesus "The Emperor of Love," was once asked if he believed in God: He said, "But, monsieur, who made all that?" (pointing to the Heavens, which "declare the glory of God"). Kant said that two things inspired him to believe in God: The Heavens above and the conscience within. Mortimer Adler says that almost all of the great thinkers have strongly believed in God. More than 90 percent of astronomers today believe in God (don't forget the first major ones:  Kepler, Copernicus, and Galileo). There certainly is more evidence for God than against Him.

Pascal offered his famous "wager," whereby he asked someone if they would want to be on the losing side of a bet where the ante is upped and the outcome is an eternity. If he were wrong in believing in God, nothing lost, but if the unbeliever was wrong, he would spend eternity in hell--not worth the risk, indeed!   It is said that ninety-nine percent of all the great thinkers have believed in God! Bertrand Russell was asked, according to D. James Kennedy, what he would say if it turned out that there was a God; he would ask Him, "Why didn't you give us more evidence?" Carl Sagan didn't want to say there was no God, but that there just wasn't any evidence for Him--there's never enough for the skeptic.

To the open mind, there is plenty of evidence (there is just enough light to see Him if you will, and just enough darkness to deny Him if you will). But God has left the matter an open question, and will not force Himself on anyone who doesn't want to believe. Someone has said that not believing in God frees one sexually--well, that about sums it up--they don't want to believe because they don't WANT to, and it would interfere with their sexual mores.

Needless to say, philosophers have debated the existence of God through the ages. Plato called Him the Supreme Good. But without revelation from God himself, we would never figure out what God is like. "Canst thou by searching find out God..." "And even though Jesus did many miracles...they WOULD not [not "could not"] believe in Him" (cf. John 12:37).

It is not for lack of evidence that one does not believe--but out of experiences in life that hardened one, or the condition of one's heart. Jesus said, "If any man wills to do His will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it is of God...." We really don't have an intellectual problem, but a moral one. When they say, "What about the Pygmy in Africa?" they are just making a smokescreen. The real issue is "Jesus Christ" and who He is. Christianity is based on objective historical facts--the resurrection of Christ from the dead--which is arguably the most attested fact of antiquity. To the unwilling heart, there is never enough evidence, but to the willing, there is more than enough. We do not have blind faith, but faith based on evidence.

The problem with believers is having "blind unbelief" (which is not believing and not knowing why or looking at the evidence either way). People suppress their natural belief in God, because of moral considerations. Atheism is a universal negative, and you cannot prove a universal negative--how could you be everywhere in the cosmos at one time to prove that there were no little green men, for example? (To say that there is no God would require omniscience and/or omnipresence like God Himself.)  So, atheism is irrational and presumptuous.

The Christian doesn't need philosophical "proof" to believe, because the Holy Spirit bears witness to him and convicts him of the truth. But the "proof's" show the reasonableness of Christianity, and that one isn't ignorant to believe. The "proof" of the pudding is in the eating, as they say ("Taste and see that the Lord is good." (Ps. 34:8) Lee Strobel calls this "properly basic belief." We experience Christ in the here and now as the Holy Spirit bears witness; all philosophical proofs just reinforce and validate our faith as being reasonable.

Pascal is quoted by D. James Kennedy as saying that we do not have what appears to be the absence of God, nor His manifest presence, but the presence of a "hidden God" ("Oh, that I might know where I might find Him"). The point is that God desires to be found by those who seek Him. "He is the rewarder of those who diligently seek Him." "Seek and you shall find." "You shall seek Me and find Me when you search for Me with all your heart." It seems like if we have to prove God, the skeptic should have to disprove Him: there's no smoking-gun evidence for either position, both require faith.  However, it takes more faith to disbelieve in God.

Do not let anyone get your focus off the issue and the main thing: The gospel of Jesus Christ, the facts of which are based on objective historical proof and the experience would not happen if the facts weren't true. If there was no God, the cosmos would have no meaning, but we wouldn't know it. This is like a deaf man being aware of music by himself. Another question would be "Why do I feel gratitude if there is no one to be grateful to?" Where did we get the idea of justice? We must believe that He exists from all the fingerprints of His hand in all creation.  Soli Deo Gloria!