The Antiestablishment Christian

"Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities [powers that be in KJV], for there is no authority except that which God has established" (Rom. 13:1, NIV). 
"What can the righteous do, when the foundations are destroyed?"  (cf. Psalm 11:3).  

People are against the establishment and even resent authority and authority figures for that matter, especially the government, but note that all authority is ordained by God and we ought to obey except when in conflict with Scripture. Government is not a necessary evil, according to Augustine, but necessary because of evil.  There are even people who are against the church as part of the establishment but for Jesus and don't see any contradiction.  Jesus, according to Humanist historian Will Durant, was the greatest revolutionist in history.  Jesus was antiestablishment par excellence!  The church is not an institution or an organization, but an organism--a living relationship and fellowship of believers on a mission.  There is a difference between establishment and institution that we should beware of.  You don't have to be for the establishment, or the system, to be in favor of the institution of government per se, or its branches.

The establishment may include a police force that profiles illegally, for instance, and you are against it.  This is why we protest to show our disdain for the status quo and don't have to accept injustice and inequity. Jesus did a lot to overthrow the establishment of the Pharisees and Sadducees but posed no viable, practical threat to Caesar.  He was a threat to the Pharisees turf and influence.  You could say he upset the religious apple cart!  Jesus was a controversialist and wasn't afraid to take a stand for what was right and to condemn the hypocrisy of the religious leaders.

It is not good to be a troublemaker; Paul had this reputation as "ringleader" of the Way, and also Elijah, who was "the one who troubled Israel".  But heresies must come to show who is approved and this does not give us free rein to be divisive, contentious, argumentative, nor judgmental--instead, we are to be peacemakers, sometimes standing in the gap and reconciling opponents.

Note that God has ordained and established the institutions of family, church, and government and we ought to be in submission to them as appropriate (cf. Rom. 13:1).  We can be against a certain leader and still be for the institution for which he stands, i.e,. respect for the office, not the officeholder.  We are not to ever become revolutionaries to overthrow the government for Christ, so as to usher in the kingdom, but that doesn't mean we cannot be reformers and heroes of our cause.  We have no social commission to "reclaim America for Christ."   We must stand up for our faith and not only declare our Christian colors but fly them proudly. We must not lose by default!    And we must maintain law and order in society and faith in the institutions or the powers that be, for if the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do? (cf. Psalm 11:3).

The rule of law was first expounded by Rev. Samuel Rutherford in his book, Lex Rex, or "the law is king." We believe in the rule of law, not men!  It upset the whole royal landscape.  We are not to be a nation of men ruling but laws ruling. No one being above the law and equally subject to it ("equal justice under the law"). Any form of the perversion or miscarriage of justice or its corruption is forbidden by God.  It seems sometimes like what James Russell Lowell said, "Truth forever on the scaffold, wrong forever on the throne."

Christians have no right to wreak havoc on the social order or to support an uprising or revolution, even if they disagree with the "system."  We must limit the powers of government leaders as Lord Acton warned:  "Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely."  If we disagree, we not only have the right to protest in civil disobedience but the mandate as long as it is concordant with the God's will and Word.

This is supposedly a constitutional republic and that means it abides by the rule of law and no one is above it.  These very concepts of justice and judicial precedent are being challenged as our president demands to see the evidence against him and to investigate the investigators of himself as the target.  This is all unprecedented.  It's been the tradition that the law is king, not the king and even the king must obey and submit to it.  We are a nation of laws, not of men, which would give us a highly whimsical and capricious government. 

You don't have to agree with the system to be for the preservation of our institutions.  Christians have no right to wreak havoc on the social order and to create or fuel chaos or anarchy, on the other hand, we are salt and light and to be of positive influence.  Christians should care a lot more about preserving our institutions than getting their agenda accomplished, no matter how noble in intent (results and unwanted repercussions matter too).  We must beware of authoritarianism, which can devolve when the checks and balances of the branches of government are dysfunctional.   

It's our right to protest or to do civil disobedience when the government demands unjust or immoral laws be obeyed--we must obey God and not man in these cases.  But we are to be model citizens otherwise and not a liability to our nation's success and prosperity.       Soli Deo Gloria! 

Ethical, Or True Lies?

My premise is that there may be times when one has no choice but to lie because the person doesn't deserve the truth and the truth does more damage in the final result.  Numbers 23:19 says God is not a man that He should lie--implying men lie!   Note that even Paul was apologetic and insisted he wasn't lying in Rom. 9:1 and Gal. 1:20.  In Col. 3:9, where it forbids lying to each other, this is referencing the body of Christ in context.  We ought to be in sync with the Holy Spirit and walking in the light so as not to lie to the Holy Spirit per Acts 5 when Ananias and Sapphira dropped dead. The warning in Revelation is to those who "love and practice lies."  Job interestingly denies lying to his comforters' faces.   We ought to be in the habit of practicing the truth not lies, but there are always exceptions to the rules.  God cannot lie (cf. Heb. 6:18; Titus1:2) but it's impossible for man not to lie!

Eph. 4:15 does say to "speak the truth in love" (and speak "lies" in love too!), but sometimes the truth often hurts and should be shirked--it's never warranted to insult or use hate speech.  We never have the prerogative to be judgmental, divisive, critical, argumentative, nor contentious in our speech or conversation. Don't ever cast a slur on your fellow man.  Note that when the Bible speaks of "truth," it's mainly specifying Scripture (cf. John 17:17)--i.e., speak the Word of God in love, not to stir hatred.  Many believers become legalists; but it is written: "do not go beyond that which is written" (1 Cor. 4:6).  What does this mean?

We can interpret the Ninth Commandment as prohibiting and forbidding false testimony in court that would damage some one's reputation and change the verdict, what is verboten here is meant to apply to that but it is elaborated further in Scripture and people have generally believed all lying, even nonintentional ones or white lies, which only are made to keep from hurting one's feelings, are patently, unequivocally wrong.  We ought never blatantly to tell falsehoods to our neighbors but what about our enemies--do they deserve the truth?  "Do not be overrighteous ... why destroy yourself?" (Eccl. 7:16, NIV).

We as believers in Christ are not "under the law" (cf. Rom. 6:14) and operate or function under a higher law at work--the law of love, and if it serves to love our neighbor better by covering up the truth or letting a misrepresentation go, then the higher law overrules.  What if telling the truth would lead to the death of your wife?  Even Abraham lied about his wife being his sister, which technically was a half-truth!  What if it meant compromising the safety of thousands of persecuted Jews during the Holocaust--when papers were counterfeited?  What if a Nazi asks you if you are harboring Jews or know their whereabouts like Corrie ten Boom did?  What if you are undercover as a mole or counterespionage agent and your concealed identity and falsehoods must be secretive?  What about the pleasantries of greetings when we cover up our malady and say, "I'm fine," when we're not in a good mood and you want to avoid pity or attention.  You may feel you don't owe them the truth concerning your privacy--it's none of their business.  There are many ethical dilemmas that one may have and the best advice is to pray that you enter not into temptation. (Plead the Fifth!). For instance, either you tell a lie, or your daughter gets raped?  We are not culpable for coerced acts done non-voluntarily.

The moment of truth is not when we are challenged to admit the truth to an adversary but when we are honest to God at the time it would cost us something if we are honest, e.g., reveal some secret fact about yourself or others.  We need to get away from making such high ethical standards for our selves that we can never achieve and end up falling into a rut of self-defeat and failure, resulting in low self-image or esteem, ultimately leading defeated lives spiritually.  I know that God abhors a (habitual, uncontrollable, pathological) lying tongue (per Prov. 6:16f), but everyone is a liar according to Romans 3:4.  Technically anyone who ever told a lie is a liar then and that includes believers, for there is one God of truth.

Technically, you could say Jesus "lied" when He was on the road to Emmaus and he led on or "pretended" or made like He was going on farther ahead or playing along with their notion of the situation.  If you want to get technical, this is one sin that there are literally dozens of ways to commit it and we all do unbeknownst to ourselves. The truth is that we are only judged according to our awareness of truth and knowledge, and anything done in faith is not sin, and only if we know the right thing to do and fail to do it, is it sin.  The kind of liar that God says is an abomination and He abhors is deliberate and habitual and even pathological, not occasional or necessitated.

Any man that claims he's never lied or doesn't do it is a liar by definition--he's self-condemned and doesn't know his own nature. A real liar is one who commits to lying as a way of life like a con artist, not a person who has found it necessary to lie.  George Washington said he couldn't tell a lie, which was a lie!  Mark Twain was more honest in saying he could tell a lie, but wouldn't!  In determining the morality of a "lie" one must examine the motive (cf. Prov. 16:2), the desired effect, and any fallout, byproduct, or unintended consequences and results (cf. Deut. 32:29), which we are held accountable for--we don't believe just because a person's motives were pure or he did it in love, that he is justified.

What is the real crime, is not just telling a little lie, but living a big one?   It's not a contest to see who can be the most honest or reveal the most secrets, sort of like comedians do when they joke about themselves--be relevant and appropriate!   What matters in the long run, is that you are on the side of the truth and don't suppress it, namely ("true truth," as Francis Schaeffer called it) and listen to the truth--God's Word is Truth! (Cf. John 18:27; Rom. 1:18).  So, who do you want as your confidant? (Cf. Psalm 25:14).  Soli Deo Gloria!