You mean: “The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.” That’s important to point out. It was simply wrong to disobey. There wasn't anything inherently wrong with the tree or its fruit nor even the knowledge that it would impart. God may have intended to let them eat of it at some future point after they passed His test of obedience and love just when children grow up when don't become evil automatically. The forbidden fruit merely represented a test of obedience love can not be forced but not have some test of faithfulness or obedience and loyalty.
Adam and Eve obviously were innocent in that they were unaware that there was an evil alternative to good and its threat to peace with God. They were as children before the age of accountability for their evil in God’s eyes. They had to decide which side they would be on—for or against God. The fruit wasn’t obviously a proverbial apple but something that did delight to the eyes and had natural appeal or temptation.
Their sin of eating of it was the prototype sin that represented all sins to some sense of the word in this sense: spring God’s grace, contradicting His truths, rejecting His authority, disputing His wisdom, repudiating His justice, and resisting His grace. What Adam and Eve sought was their own will, delight, plans, and wisdom while rejecting God’s; and we do the same today when we do our own thing and do things our way instead of God’s way according to God’s will or even seeking it—we still think we know better or more than our Maker. A believer actively seeks God’s will and submits to it
No comments:
Post a Comment